Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Peace - beginning here

A reflection Luke 3: 2-6: Sunday, 10 December 2006


The second Sunday of Advent is the Sunday for Peace, and you might be forgiven for wondering just how today’s bible readings talk to us about peace. Well, they don’t – at least, not directly. What they do talk to us about is “change”.

Malachi is about change. John the Baptiser is about change.

In the Hebrew Scriptures, we hear the prophet ask:

“Who can endure the day of God’s coming, and who can stand when God appears?”

And God speaks:

“I will draw near to you for judgment; I will be swift to bear witness against the sorcerers, against the adulterers, against those who swear falsely, against those who oppress the hired workers in their wages, the widow and the orphan, against those who thrust aside the alien, and do not fear me.”

But the Holy One is not really interested in judgment; what is really desired is change:

“Return to me, and I will return to you.”

God’s desire is for reconciliation:

“[You will] be mine,” says the Lord of hosts, “my special possession on the day when I act, and I will spare [you] as parents spare their children.”

When we’re thinking about peace, then the list of accusations against God’s people is interesting: adulterers, liars, oppressors, the arrogant – all of these people who destroy peace. And peace cannot be possible without change, the opportunity for change which God holds out to all.

And this is a central theme in the life and work of John who went around baptising. What was baptism for John?

“basically the rite functioned as an expression of willingness to change and be prepared for change by receiving divine forgiveness. Baptism is submission to this new initiative. It is not simply change of the individual, but change of the individual in readiness for change of the world. Change of the world means transformation, liberation, freedom, salvation.

Bill Loader

The Chinese philosopher Lao-tse says exactly this:

"If there is to be peace in the world,
There must be peace in the nations.

If there is to be peace in the nations,
There must be peace in the cities.

If there is to be peace in the cities,
There must be peace between neighbours.

If there is to be peace between neighbours,
There must be peace in the home.

If there is to be peace in the home,
There must be peace in the heart."

Christ coming to us at Christmas – this Christmas, every Christmas – is to draw us into the process of change, to draw us towards peace with ourselves, peace with those we love and with those we hate, to draw us towards peace in the world, to draw us towards the peace of the kingdom of God. And that peace begins here.

A prayer by Thom Shuman, a prayer for peace:

“but you come”

if you came

with a fistful of anger,

who could endure?

but you come

with open hands,

eager to grasp our own

in love.

if you came

with the fire of judgment,

who could endure?

but you come

with the light of grace

to show us the way.

if you came

hardened against our sin,

who could endure?

but you come

holding us in your heart,

so we might have life,

if you came

bearing bad news,

we might be able to handle it . . .

but can we endure

the gift

of good news?

even so,

come, Lord Jesus,

come.

(c) Thom M. Shuman

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

Hope - stars in the darkness

A reflection on Jeremiah 33:14-16; Luke 21:25-36: Sunday, 3 December 2006


Yesterday, I was reading the letters to the editor in The Weekend Australian magazine. A number of people had written responding to an article the previous week about global warming. I’ll share some of those responses with you in a moment, but first I want to point to a reality: the world is no longer the way it used to be. Global warming or climate change can no longer be denied. After years of fruitless attempts to share the bad news with us, the environmental scientists have finally been listened to. Is it too late? I don’t know; but I do know that things are looking pretty black for us, and things are looking pretty black for the world.

There is an ancient Persian saying: “When it is dark enough you can see the stars.” “When it is dark enough you can see the stars!”

Today is the first Sunday in Advent. Even though the shops have been telling us for weeks that Christmas is coming, today is the first Sunday that the church turns its eyes towards 25th December and begins to prepare for the coming of a baby.

But this morning’s readings are not about the coming baby. This morning’s readings are about the coming darkness. Our readings from Jeremiah and Luke are quite dark. And it isn’t just the readings that are dark. When we look at our world we also see much darkness.

Twenty centuries after Christ we still have wars, poverty and injustice. The world is still racked with violence, yet not destroyed. It is filled with destruction, yet not overcome. We live amidst injustice, poverty and prejudice, yet still there are signs of God’s kingdom, signs of hope.

And just as in the time of Jeremiah and in the time of Luke, we wait and we watch and we hope - for the light which Jesus will bring. For when it is dark enough we can see the stars - those little specks of light that bring hope. This first Sunday in Advent is the Sunday of hope. As Christians we are called to be people filled with hope.

Walter Brueggemann, the biblical scholar, tells us that Jeremiah was written while the Israelites lived in exile. He tells us that in exile they learnt some important things: They learnt how to express sadness, rage and loss. They learnt how to complain - not in a way which left them overwhelmed by the darkness. No. Their complaining was so that they could search for stars in the darkness. In exile they learnt how to face the darkness of their lives so that they could live in hope.

Sometimes it feels like we live in exile too. Family life, society, and the church are no longer what they used to be. The old ways are being dismantled and we are still waiting for the new ways to be birthed. At times like this we have three choices just as the Israelites of Jeremiah’s time had choices:

First, we can pretend it isn’t dark; we can go on pretending nothing has changed. But if we do this we will be left behind. The hope we have for the future will become less and less real and will no longer sustain us. Interestingly, there were letters yesterday crying out, “There’s nothing really wrong with the environment. We’ve got nothing to worry about.” It’s extraordinary the lengths people will go to, to pretend that the darkness is not real.

Second choice, we can focus on the darkness. Many people focus on the darkness of life. They keep picking at all the things that are wrong. They worry, they complain, they are negative, they become depressed and in the end they have no hope. They refuse to see the stars until, in the end, they are unable to see the stars. Again, yesterday’s letters illustrated this stance too: all is doom and gloom, global warming means the death of us and the death of the world. Darkness obscures the possibility of stars.

But there is a third choice: we can acknowledge the darkness and put our energy into searching for the stars. If we are willing to see the darkness in our lives and in the world then we can look for the stars. The stars are those points in our lives where we meet God. Those people and places that remind us that God is with us; that God will never leave us alone; that God’s ways of justice and faithfulness will come when we live lives of justice and faithfulness.

Last week, Joan was telling me about just such an event in her life and in the lives of some young refugees from Afghanistan. After a long period of time, two of their brothers arrived in Australia. After all of the struggles to convince the Australian government that their situation is one of genuine need, after all of the paperwork, all of the waiting, after many disappointments, light has shone in their darkness. There still is darkness, not just for this family with parents and a brother still in Afghanistan, still in great danger but also darkness for the millions of refugees around the world. But there are still stars that shine, to give hope to all those who wait in darkness.

As we prepare for Christmas we remember that each Advent, each coming, is a reminder to us of the hope we have because God chose to become human and live among us. Even in the darkness, or perhaps, because of the darkness, God chose to become one of us. God continues to choose today to love us, to forgive us, to invite us to journey into God’s future looking always for the stars – those signs of God’s presence with us.

Each Advent we are reminded of how God wants us to respond to the darkness within the world. We are to be the people who seek out the tiny lights of justice, and kindness, and loving, which are a part of life. We are to live in ways which make many more of these tiny lights until the darkness of our world is illuminated with the light of Christ.

Sunday, November 19, 2006

Hannah - keeper of the faith

A reflection on 1 Samuel, chapter 1: Sunday, 19 November 2006


Once upon a time in a land far away there lived a woman all on her own. Perhaps I should explain: about the time - long before you and I were born, or our parents, or even their parents; about the land - it was far away, far enough for us not to have visited, even though some have tried; about the woman - because there is no story without the woman; but most of all I should explain about her living on her own.


You see, she lived on her own with other people. By which I mean she shared her home, her hearth, her bed with others, but she was still on her own. It’s possible to live with others and be alone. It’s possible to rise and eat and work and sleep surrounded by family and friends and still be on your own. Perhaps you know what I mean.


The woman’s name was Hannah - you had guessed that by now - and her aloneness was not comfortable: not for her, not for the man who loved her, and certainly not for the woman who feared her. When worth is measured in baby boys, then “barren” is a desperate word. It seems that Elkanah loved her all the same, even loved her more, at least that’s the way the story reads, but still barren was who she was. She knew it, and he knew it, as did her rival.


Oh, he tried to make it comfortable. Each year, a double portion of the sacrificial lamb, to comfort, to reassure, to let her know that he saw more than emptiness in her. But her emptiness couldn’t be hidden. Her emptiness became both the cause of the other woman’s delight and the cause of her anguish. How could he love her? She was empty where Penninah was full; she was desolate where Penninah was fertile; she had no sons while Penninah had ensured a lineage, a heritage, a source of confidence in times to come. But still, he favoured the wrong woman.


What does an empty woman do in times like those?


Perhaps a woman who keeps the faith might go to pray. If all else fails, perhaps the One who closed the womb might also be the One to open it. A long time ago that’s how it was seen, and even now.


Now Hannah was one who kept the faith. And so she prayed, and her prayers were answered at once.


I wonder what a modern practitioner of science might say to Hannah’s answered prayer. Do you think there might be murmurings of “mind over matter”?


Eli the priest, once reassured that the woman is empty rather than full of wine, sends her on her way: “Go in peace, and may God grant your desire.”


Peace, of course, is the very thing which an empty woman lacks. While others rise in the dark of night to attend infant cries, while others chase the rebellious offspring or mop the fevered brow, at least they have the peace of knowing their worth. For they are the mothers of sons. But in barrenness there is no peace.


“Go in peace”. An easy thing to say; a harder thing to do.


But Hannah is one who keeps the faith. Perhaps Eli’s words are a gift.


Perhaps the empty woman is already no longer empty. She is not full of child, but perhaps she bears the seed of hope. She goes away hoping to find divine favour now lodged inside her womb. And she is no longer sad.


Faith and hope are not strangers.


Faith and hope go hand in hand into the face of death. There is light in the darkness. There is resurrection to follow death. Dying to self leads to rising in Christ.


Have you noticed how often this story is told? Hannah, Ruth and Naomi, a blind man beside the road, Lazarus from a tomb, Jesus from the tomb.


And in our time: Bonhoeffer, Martin Luther King, Mother Teresa – life from death in the slums and the streets, faith and hope hand in hand.


And now we are keepers of the faith.


Help us,
O Keeper of Faith,
to keep the faith entrusted to us,
faith in a world worth saving,
faith in a dream worth sharing,
faith in a heritage worth keeping
even as we reinvigorate it
to have meaning for us now.
Help us keep faith in You,
and help us not to lose faith in ourselves,
for faith is the substance of our hope,
and hope, the assurance of love.
Praise to You, O Faithful One,
now and forever.
Amen.

(source of prayer – Miriam Therese Winter, WomanWisdom)

Monday, November 13, 2006

Poverty and abundance

A reflection on Ruth 3:1-5,4:13-17 and Mark 12:38-44: preached on Sunday, 12 November

I’ve spent a fair bit of time in the last few days trying to work out where to start with this reflection. Initially, I was drawn to the scandalous bit. You know, start “shock and horror” and go from there. But then I thought, if I was going to talk about poverty and abundance, perhaps I should open by reflecting on my own experience of poverty, or rather my own inexperience of poverty. Then again, it’s important to note that these are women’s stories – stories about women, for women. Again I could speak about this from the depths of my own inexperience of being a woman. So where to begin?

What the heck, let’s start with the scandal!

Naomi says to her daughter-in-law: “observe the place where [Boaz] lies; then, go and uncover his feet and lie down… ” To which Ruth replies: “All that you tell me I will do.”

So Ruth went and uncovered Boaz’s feet.

Have you ever wondered about that? Have you ever paused to consider why Naomi would want her beloved daughter-in-law to do that? She’s just come back from the fields, from hours of back breaking work in the sun and the dirt, and her mother-in-law says, “Go and uncover Boaz’s dirty, smelly feet and lie down with him.” Does that make sense to you?

Perhaps it makes sense if we understand that the bible doesn’t always mean what it says. Sometimes the bible uses a polite word for something else. “Feet” in the bible doesn’t always mean feet! Ever wondered about those six-winged angels in Isaiah that used one pair of wings to fly, another pair to hide their faces, and the third pair to hide… their feet!

“Observe the place where [Boaz] lies; then, go and uncover his feet and lie down… ”

Does this surprise you? Does this shock you? Aren’t you just a little bit scandalised? But doesn’t it make sense now?

These are the lengths to which Naomi and Ruth will go in order to secure a future for themselves and a heritage for their lost husbands. These are the lengths to which resourceful, committed, intelligent women will go, breaking the rules, risking scandal and shame, so that they might honour the promises they have made to each other.

Attitude is everything.

In a world of limited good, those who have little must depend upon those who have a lot. In Jesus’ world, those who had little were entirely at the mercy of those who had an abundance. And generally the attitude of the rich was (and is) to preserve their riches, to only give away what they felt they could afford, and often to only give it away expecting to get something in return. And the attitude of the poor? Well, they had (and have) two choices – resignation (the hopeless acceptance of their lot) or hope (the refusal to concede that what is will always be what is).

Naomi and Ruth were poor – at least, they were poor in material terms, in societal terms; but they were rich in other ways – they were rich in their commitment to one another, they were rich in their resourcefulness, they were rich in their belief that things might be different, and they were rich in their willingness to risk scandal in order to secure a future for themselves and their kin. They were poor and yet they also had an abundance.

If we turn to today’s gospel story of the poor woman and her two small coins, we are immediately confronted by the different attitudes of those who are rich and those who are poor. Jesus drags the attention of his disciples to the generosity of the one who can’t afford to be generous. It’s an attitude thing:

“Truly I tell you, this poor widow has put in more than all those… For all of them have contributed out of their abundance; but she out of her poverty has put in everything she had, all she had to live on.”

Now, when we bring together these three extraordinary women, we find something here which pricks our consciences and which asks us questions about poverty and abundance in our own lives.

In the vast richness of Australian society, how much time to we devote to imagining ourselves to be poor? All the illusions of how hard-up we are while we live without having to worry about where our next meal will come from or whether we will have a roof over our heads at night. When we stop long enough to put aside the illusion of poverty, we know ourselves to be rich; but we also know that it is possible to be rich in the material things yet remain poor in the things that really matter: hope, love, forgiveness, peace, compassion.

These three women operate with an abundance of the intangible things of life. What must it take to give away all that you have? How much generosity? What an abundance of hope there must be to make oneself so vulnerable. What must it take to risk so much for another? How much love? What an abundance of hope there must be to make oneself so vulnerable.

Taken together, these women ask us, “How much hope do we have? How prepared are we to do something in order to realise that hope?’

I suppose that these are the questions I see confronting John and Mary (whose child Amanda was baptised in this service): how much hope do they have for their child’s future? And how far are they prepared to go in order to realise that hope? And these are questions for all of us, parents, grandparents, and single folk alike. What hope do we have for the future, and how far are we prepared to go?

For me, there is something which lies behind the questions I raise. After all, it is possible to be filled with hope and expectations for personal riches; but without belief in the never-ending supply – the abundance – of God’s grace, personal riches mean very little. The world is full of people who are rich beyond dreaming but whose lives are full of emptiness and despair. Without something beyond ourselves, something which calls us beyond ourselves, then we are poor indeed.

But those whose lives are transformed by the living God, who are nurtured and sustained by the overflowing abundance of God’s grace, they are the ones who go beyond themselves to transform the world through love and kindness and compassion. Out of the abundance of grace they give all that they have so that all might live. Amen.

Sunday, November 05, 2006

A time for prayer

A reflection on “Water… a time for prayer”, Ruth 1:1-18, and Mark 12:28-34; preached Sunday 5 November 2006

We arrived in Clermont in January 1997, when the country was displaying all the signs of the longest dry spell in recorded history. Our last hundred kilometres was through “the long paddock” – the cow cockies’ shorthand for the roadside where cattle had been turned loose to graze because the real paddocks were bare. I sought to reassure my daughter that the gaunt grey shapes of the Brahmans were not indicators that the end was nigh, but my words simply betrayed my ignorance of just how bad things really were.

A few days later we went visiting. The prospect of a property with an eleven kilometre driveway kindled our imaginations, but again reality bit into our naivety. We were taken aback as Bill’s cows rushed to greet us – cows smart enough to realise that vehicles were the source of the molasses and hay which was keeping them alive, but not smart enough to tell the difference between the feed truck and the new minister’s station wagon.

Further out we called at “Tricorner”, a carefully selected block of prime dirt – black soil so rich and so deep that the homestead had to be built on a concrete raft floating fifteen feet over bedrock. The owners had not been there long and their first year had been a good one: wheat going nearly three tons to the acre without fertilizer. But in dry times the next season saw half of that, and the year after half of that, and the year after half again.

But the saddest story was Martin’s (not his real name). His was one of the older properties, gracing the surrounding district with its name and history, a block of great beauty and immense richness – when the rain fell. Martin was a man of great faith. Shortly after we arrived, I met him in town and he spoke passionately of his love for the Lord and his deep-seated belief in the power of prayer. Repentance for his sins and earnest supplications claiming the promises of scripture would win him through. No, it had hardly rained for six years, but his faith and perseverance were sure to be rewarded by his Lord.

There was a certain fragility, however, to Martin’s claims. Six years with little or no rain in answer to his petitions meant a heroic battle to stave off doubt and uncertainty. When the end came it was not pretty. In faith, in confidence, in response to the weather bureau’s predictions and the ag. consultant’s advice, Martin planted sunflowers. And nothing happened. A week without rain, another week, a month. And almost overnight, the property was sold and Martin was gone.

Three weeks after that it rained – not much, but enough to bring the sunflowers from the soil. There was follow up rain, too – not much, but enough for a crop. A drive past Martin’s old property revealed paddock after paddock of golden, nodding sunnies, a crop like the good old days, a crop to fill the silos, to keep the property going another year at least, a crop to pay off some debts and to keep the bank manager from the door.

And Martin? Well, it’s a small world, and it was inevitable that he would hear what had transpired. Rain had fallen, but not for him. Martin had what we dismissively call a “breakdown”. At least he didn’t do what many farmers have done over the years – take the rifle down from the wall and go for one last walk down to the machine shed. But Martin was a broken man.

You and I both know that it rains on the just and unjust alike. The bible tells us that. Conversely, it fails to rain with the same lack of discrimination. Martin’s prayers presumed that God plays favourites, that the faithful will be singled out, that we just have to have enough faith. But it doesn’t work like that. After all, if it worked like that we’d all be believers.

How does prayer work?

I’m not sure just how much my prayers change God. What I do know is that my prayers change me. I could dress that up in religious language and say that through my prayers the Holy Spirit aligns my will with God’s will. Perhaps that’s what happens. Whatever the mechanism, prayer changes me.

Somehow, I am altered. When I attend to God (and surely that is what is happening when I pray) when I attend to God, I am changed.

The story of Ruth and Naomi is a profound example of how people are changed. We begin with Ruth, a Jewish wife and mother, taken to a foreign land (I hope you noted Elimelech’s pragmatism in the face of famine) and the story rapidly descends into tragedy. By the seventh verse of the opening chapter, Naomi has been widowed and her sons are dead. She is adrift in a foreign land without a single male relative to provide her with security and a place in the community. Equally, her daughters-in-law – Orpah and Ruth, having given up their birthright as Moabites and now widowed – are also without kith and kin to provide for them.

We should avoid romanticising what happens next. Naomi tries to reduce her problems by divesting herself of the liability of two daughters-in-law she simply cannot provide for. Just as practically, Ruth and Orpah resist, at least Orpah resists for a little while before deciding that her best bet is to attempt to find a Moabite man prepared to take in a used woman. And Ruth – well, Ruth utters those fabulous, famous words:

“Where you go, I will go;
where you lodge, I will lodge;
your people shall be my people,
and your God my God.”

And so begins the story of Ruth and Naomi.

What do we take from their tale? After all, God features very little in the book of Ruth. We don’t hear much about prayer; we certainly don’t hear of fervent supplications offered up and divine compassion miraculously revealed in response to faith. I’m sure that Naomi, as a faithful Jew, and Ruth, as a faithful convert, did pray. I’m sure that they called upon the name of the Lord, but the point of the story is not about how God is changed but about how Ruth and Naomi are changed.

They change. They do things differently. They attempt something neither of them has attempted before and, with great courage, they make things happen. Tragedy does not overcome them. There would be no story if they had not turned themselves around and together – note, together – confronted what had to be confronted.

Now I haven’t said much about this week of prayer, have I?

What should I say? That if we pray hard enough, God will have a change of heart and bring the rain? That if we just have more faith it will rain? That we need to repent of our sins and it will rain? That we just need to persevere a little longer – a little longer than poor old Martin, anyhow – and God will change.

Perhaps it might be more helpful to look at how we are called to change. The suggested reflections for this week of prayer call us to profound change: to be thankful, to change our ways, to care for creation, to act with compassion, and then to rest in order that we might be renewed. It is no longer a secret that there are direct and incontrovertible links between climate change and humanity’s wilful disregard of creation, and now we ask, “Is it too late for us to change?”

Surely Ruth and Naomi are to be our models – looking out for one another, demonstrating the total commitment that we need if we are to change our attitude to God’s gift of rain, demonstrating how far it is possible to go together to make things right. “I will go where you will go… Your people shall be my people.”

And here is the link to today’s gospel, Mark’s story of “which commandment is the greatest of all”:

Did you note something quite cute in Mark’s account of the scribe’s question? The scribe asks for one commandment; Jesus gives him two: Love God, and love your neighbour. And the one who does those two things is “not far from the kingdom of God”.

Praying for rain for me and for my needs is not the answer. Loving my neighbour is the answer. Recognising that the guzzling of resources that goes on in prosperous Western societies is stealing my Third World neighbour’s future. Being bold enough to say, “Your people will be my people”. Knowing that I have to change because if I don’t then the kingdom of God will slip further and further away.

I commend to you the material distributed by the Heads of Churches; I ask you to consider what changes we might make as individuals, as families, and together as the church in order to use God’s gift of water responsibly. I ask you to investigate for yourselves the true nature of what we face, because to love our neighbour means we need to be educated. You might like to visit your local library and read volume twelve of the Griffith review, or something by Professor Ian Lowe the president of the Australian Conservation Foundation, or even The weather makers by Tim Flannery.

We need to change. We need to do things differently. We must attempt something we have not attempted before and, with great courage, we must make things happen. It is not inevitable that tragedy will overcome us. But there may be no story if we do not turn ourselves around and together – note, together – confront what has to be confronted.

But, whatever else you do, please pray. And may God change us all. Amen.

Sunday, October 29, 2006

To give sight to the blind

A reflection on Mark 10: 46-52, preached Sunday, 29 October 2006

Here’s a silly question. You will have heard it before; you will probably have asked it yourself on more than one occasion. I know I have. So, here it is:

“Is anyone sitting here?”

Now think about that for a moment. There’s a vacant chair next to you and someone comes up and asks, “Is anyone sitting here?” As silly questions go, it’s right up there isn’t it?

“Is there anyone sitting here?”

“Yes, she’s invisible though, so you can’t see her.”

“Yes, he’s just very, very tiny. Please don’t sit on him.”

I suppose silly questions deserve silly answers.

Here’s another. This is my personal silly question. This is the question that upsets my wife somewhat. A little background information for you: this is the question I usually ask after Carol has done something such as kick her toes against a hard object, or burnt herself in the kitchen. And my question is:

“Why did you do that?”

I will spare you Carol’s response.

Here is a third silly question. A blind man comes to Jesus and says, “Have mercy on me.” And Jesus asks him:

“What do you want me to do for you?”

Now I don’t mean to be rude about the Messiah, but at first glance it seems a pretty silly question. A blind man comes to Jesus and says, “Have mercy on me.”

But Jesus asks, “What do you want me to do for you?" for a reason. It seems to me that Jesus is trying to uncover something here; his question is about making explicit the relationship between healer and helped. This is a question which demands an answer spelling out the nature of the relationship between Jesus and Bartimaeus.

And listen to the blind man’s answer: “My teacher, let me see again.”

“My teacher.” Do you hear the relationship between Jesus and Bartimaeus? And do you hear what he asks for?

I think that there are two parts to the blind man’s response. One is about making plain the relationship which Bartimaeus is prepared to enter into. That’s quite clear. The other part, however, has to be read between the lines.

Here are the clues, and I think there are five of them. First of all, the man’s name is Bartimaeus – son of Timaeus. Secondly, the man refuses to be silenced. Thirdly, he throws off his cloak in order to get to Jesus. Fourthly, his request is framed in language which implies this is about permission giving rather than miracle working, And finally, he asks to see “again”.

These are all clues which point to what this man is really asking for: he is asking for the restoration of relationships. As the son-of-Timaeus, his place in society was defined by his relationships, but his begging cloak spread out on the dirt before him to catch the alms thrown to him is a symbol of how he is cut off from normal everyday relationships, relationships which he once had and now no longer has. He is determined to find his way back; he casts aside the cloak in order to be restored; and he understands that this is a matter of attitude rather than medicine. “Have mercy on me! Let me see again.”

Now Mark tells a clever story. Do you recall last week’s gospel reading? James and John, two of Jesus’ closest disciples, come to him and ask him for a favour. What does Jesus ask them? He asks them exactly the same question he asks Bartimaeus. Exactly the same question: “What do you want me to do for you?”

And how do James and John reply? Is their request about restoring relationships, or is their attempt to grab power and authority at the expense of the other disciples the opposite of restoring relationships? And they said to him, "Grant us to sit, one at your right hand and one at your left, in your glory."

What is the result of such a question? “When the ten heard this, they began to be angry with James and John.”

Discipleship is an interesting thing in the gospel of Mark. Throughout the gospel, the chosen disciples – the Twelve – always, repeat always, get it wrong. And it is others who get it right. From beginning to end, it is others who intuitively understand what it means to be a disciple. From Peter’s mother-in-law who rises from her sick bed and immediately begins to serve Jesus and the others to the women who stand at the foot of the cross, disciples are those who follow Jesus on the way.

And blindness is an interesting metaphor for the condition of those who don’t get it. The scribes are described as being blind; the Pharisees and teachers of the law are called “blind guides”; and the twelve disciples, the very ones closest to Jesus, the ones who should be able to see, they too are blind to what it means to be a follower.

But not Bartimaeus: “Immediately he regained his sight and followed him on the way.”

Jesus asks us a question: “What do you want me to do for you?”

What is our answer? Dare we ask “to see”?

If our eyes are opened to following Jesus, where does “the way” take us?

Remember, “the way” is the way of the cross. Following Jesus is not about power and authority; it’s not about sitting alongside Jesus in all his glory. Following Jesus is about the first being the last; it is about being “the slave of all”.

If our eyes are opened, if we are given sight, we will see things we would rather not see. We will begin to see what Jesus saw: a blind man begging for mercy beside the road. Do we want to see that? We will see the crippled and the lame and the deaf and even the dead. Is that why we are asking to be given sight? We will see the poor, the hungry, the widow, the orphan, the alien at our gates.

But if we see the “bad news” then we will be blessed with the opportunity to bring the “good news”. We will be graced with the opportunity “to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favour” and to do that through restored relationships. As we reach out to serve others, we will find ourselves serving the Messiah; we will find our relationship with others drawing us into deeper relationship with God.

Thom Shuman captures the bitter sweet nature of Jesus’ gift of sight in this prayer based on today’s readings:

sitting duck

i would wear

steel-toed boots

to nudge my friends

out of the way,

or high-heeled boots

so i am not dirtied

by the muck of the world,

but you rub

my Achilles' heel raw

with the pebble of

servanthood;

i would take

self-defence courses

to protect myself

from all the blows

the world throws at me,

but you pull off

my gloves

and show me

the wide open stance

of grace;

i would build a fence

of cynicism and doubt

around my soul

so no one can sneak past

with their pain and need,

but you hold out

your heart to me,

naked and bleeding

from its brokenness.

Jesus, Son of David,

have pity on me:

so when I want to be

safe and secure,

i can become a sitting duck

for your vulnerability.

(c) 2006 Thom M. Shuman

May we, like Bartimaeus, regain our sight and follow Jesus… all the way to the cross. Amen.

Tuesday, October 24, 2006

What do we ask of Jesus?

A reflection on Mark 10:35-45, preached Sunday, 22 October 2006

From time to time – but not very often, it seems to me – along comes a bible passage that doesn’t really need a lot of hard work to comprehend. Frequently, bible passages use language which has no modern equivalent or refer to social structures which we don’t understand; sometimes they lend themselves to a number of different interpretations; sometimes they appear to contradict other passages of scripture. So, when a piece such as this morning’s gospel reading comes along, it’s something of a relief to the preacher preparing the sermon.

Last week, reflecting on the story of the rich man and those words of Jesus about camels and the eyes of needles, I quoted Stacey Simpson and her memories of being a seven-year-old hearer of the gospel. She said, “The little girl inside me knew that these words of Jesus were clear and hard and scary”.

Sometimes the words of Jesus are clear, and frequently those clear words are hard and not a little bit scary.

Jesus says, “Whoever wishes to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wishes to be first among you must be slave of all”. I don’t think it gets much clearer or harder or scarier than that.

I suspect that none of us needs to hear a theological exposition of what Jesus means. We know full well that we are called to serve, and we are not slow to point to those disciples of Jesus who appear to have lost track of being a “slave to all” in favour of fame and fortune.

The message is clear, but why is it so hard?

This morning I simply want to give you three examples of how the gospel challenges us, and invite your reflection upon how these words apply to each of us individually as well as how they apply to us as a community of disciples.

First story:

Carol and I recently spent time with a colleague who told us of a member of his congregation who had come to him for help. The man, let’s call him James, related a story of always being passed over for promotion. He had studied, he had read books on how to succeed in his workplace, he had been to seminars, he had taken on a “life coach”, he had applied all the recommended theories of leadership and he was the most senior person in the workplace but still he was being passed over. Our friend asked him, “James, why do you want to be promoted?” James replied, “Well, getting promoted is what is supposed to happen. It will show I’m good at what I do. It will show I’m worth something. After all, the more people you are in charge of, the more successful you are.”

Our friend thought for a moment and then asked, “Is that what Jesus tells us?”

James was very thoughtful and then the two of them, James and his minister, went on to have a conversation about the example and words of Jesus in stories like this:

"You know that among the Gentiles those whom they recognise as their rulers lord it over them… But it is not so among you… whoever wishes to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wishes to be first among you must be slave of all.”

Slowly James began to understand just how much he had bought the world’s priority on success; its definition of how a person’s worth is measured. He came to see how much he had lost sight of his calling as a follower of Jesus. It is not how many people you are in charge of, but how many you serve.

Many of you may well be thinking, “But this doesn’t apply to me, I’m long past trying to be the best, trying to climb the promotion ladder.” Then let me tell you the second story.

Last weekend my sister and I spent time helping our parents clean out their house in readiness to move into an independent living unit in a BlueCare facility. On more than one occasion, my father was heard to say things like, “I’ve reached my use-by-date. I suppose I’ll have to get used to being no use anymore”. It was really sad to hear.

And part of my sadness is because my father has bought the world’s definition of worth. He no longer has the same degree of control over his life as he once had and so he feels he no longer has anything to contribute. His view of the world remains tied to notions of competence and success, and he is yet to discover that worth can be measured in relationships and in opportunities to serve others.

Whether we are climbing the corporate ladder or moving in the world of retirement, the gospel is hard to deal with because it challenges so much that we have been taught, so much we have strived for, so much that gives us comfort and security.

Third and final story (and this is the scary one):

Recently, at a Presbytery committee meeting, one of the people (let’s call him John) was expressing his dismay that the church seemed happy to slip into decline. John went on to say that he wanted to be part of a church that was successful. Others tried to say something about the risks of chasing success, that having a church bursting at the seams is no guarantee of being faithful followers of Jesus. The discussion that followed revealed some interesting understandings among the people there. For some Christians like John there is a strong connection between serving and failing, and an equally strong connection between leading and succeeding. And that is the scary part.

In Mark’s gospel Jesus tells us that, as his followers, leading and succeeding are not our destiny. And I’m confident Jesus is not talking about failing either. Jesus calls us to a different way. He calls us to serve, to value others, to attend to their needs. This is a call which places relationship above all else.

Our culture tells us that if we are not the best, the star, the person in charge, then our worth is limited – even non-existent. But Jesus says our true worth lies in relationships: with God, with each other, and with those we are called to serve. By being faithful to this call, we find our real worth as human beings and as children of God.

Because we live in such an individualistic age, it is easy to recognise the truth of the call to serve in our own lives, but equally, perhaps even more so, we have a communal responsibility to serve. This is our raison-d’ĂȘtre, our purpose as a church, our call to be a community of disciples. The measure of our success is not in the numbers of people who fill our pews; it is in the number of people we serve.

Serving others becomes the marker of the reign of God. It is the sign of compassion, the indicator of the presence of mercy and justice, the means by which good news is brought to the poor.